↑↓ move · ⏎ open · esc close
// Solutions · Finance Automation
Finance automation goes wrong when speed is bought with weaker review. We automate the mechanical work — capture, matching, routing, posting, reporting — and make the control points stronger and more visible than they were on paper.
Three-way match
Purchase order
PO-2026-0418Approved commitment
B$24,500
Goods receipt
GRN-2026-0771What actually arrived
B$24,500
Supplier invoice
INV-88213What is being claimed
B$25,850
Variance B$1,350 — outside 2% tolerance
Payment blocked. Queued for a human decision rather than paid on trust.
Illustrative documents · example data
// The trail
One commitment, followed from requisition to blocked payment. Every line records who acted, in which role, under which authority limit — and the log is append-only, so a correction reads as a correction.
Nurul A. Requester
Raised requisition against budget line OPS-14
04 Jul · 09:12
Awang M. Dept. Head
Approved — within delegated limit
authority · up to B$25,000
04 Jul · 11:40
System Budget control
Checked remaining budget · B$61,200 available
04 Jul · 11:40
Siti N. Procurement
Issued purchase order to approved supplier
05 Jul · 08:55
System Three-way match
Variance B$1,350 over PO — payment blocked, queued for review
authority · tolerance 2%
19 Jul · 16:03
Hj. Rahman Finance Manager
Pending decision — accept variance or return to supplier
authority · above B$25,000
Open
// What you get
Every automated step leaves an entry someone can point an auditor at — which is usually more than the paper process managed.
Supplier invoices captured, matched against purchase order and goods receipt, and routed for approval with the variance flagged rather than buried.
Claims submitted with receipts from a phone, checked against policy limits, approved through the proper chain and paid in a run rather than one by one.
Commitments checked against remaining budget at the point of request, with over-budget items escalated instead of discovered at month end.
Journals, recurring entries and period closing handled consistently, with document numbering and posting profiles that keep the ledger reconcilable.
Bank statements imported and matched, and finance kept in step with the operational systems that generate the transactions in the first place.
Trial balance, P&L, balance sheet, cash position and receivables ageing available on demand, from the same records the approvals ran through.
// How we get there
We write down the control you rely on today — including the informal ones — before replacing any of them with a workflow.
Document the current approval limits, segregation of duties, review points and reporting obligations, including the ones that only exist as habit.
Agree the target workflows, matrices, budget checks and numbering, and confirm with finance leadership that nothing weakens in the move.
Configure the flows and reports, integrate banking and operational systems, and run a parallel period against your existing close.
Reconcile the parallel period, sign off the control map as implemented, train the team and hand over the runbooks.
// FAQ
In practice they prefer it. Each approval records who acted, in which role, under which authority limit, at what time, and against which document version — which is stronger evidence than an initialled printout. The trail is append-only, so a correction shows as a correction rather than replacing history.
No. Many engagements keep the existing ledger and automate everything upstream of it — capture, matching, approval, budget control — posting the result across. Where the ledger itself is the constraint we will say so rather than build elaborate workarounds around it.
No. Each solution is a configured slice of the same platform, so you can start with one department and add another later without a migration or a second integration to maintain. What you do get from the start is one data fabric underneath — so when the second solution arrives it already recognises your people, approvals and records.
Yes. Most engagements leave existing line-of-business systems in place and integrate with them through APIs, scheduled syncs or event feeds. Where an existing system is genuinely the blocker we will say so, and that becomes an Application Modernization conversation rather than something we quietly work around.
// Get started
Usually it is supplier invoice approval or expense claims. Either one is a contained first phase with a measurable result.
// Pairs well with
Chat with us on WhatsApp
Pick the team you need — we'll open the chat.
Ask Teky Bot
AI-assisted · replies may contain mistakes
Please don't share passwords or personal data. AI processes your messages. See our Privacy Policy.
We set no cookies of our own and run no trackers — just two on-device preferences (theme, this notice). The Google Map on our Contact page can set Google's. Details in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
